I have been thinking about a list of Lefties I admire. Sure, it would be a pretty short list, but among them would have to be Newark Mayor Corey Booker. On Meet the Press, he plainly stated that the attacks by Obama using Bain Capital as a the vehicle are unfair and nauseating. The DNC and David Axelrod quickly brought him to heel forcing him to make a YourTube video that contradicted his earlier statement. But the cats out of the bag and he is not alone.
Rabid Sanity
That which does not kill me only delays the inevitable.
Monday, May 21, 2012
Wednesday, May 16, 2012
Another Massive Obama Fail
For the second year in a row, Obama's budget received zero votes in the Senate. Coupled with the 414-0 vote against his budget in the House of Representatives, you can say that he is a unifier. You can't say that he is serious about his budgets when not even Dingy Harry Reid or Jon Tester will vote for it. (Of course, I was just pointing out that Jon is just another vote for Reid).
Why on earth does anyone say that the Democrats are serious about budgeting? Another lie.
Why on earth does anyone say that the Democrats are serious about budgeting? Another lie.
Tuesday, May 15, 2012
Massive Obama Fail
I had predicted before that Obama was in trouble for reelection. I just didn't think that it would get to be this bad. Just look at what has been going on the last few weeks and see if you can't smell the desperate flop sweat that is coming from Chicago. As an example, remember when Obama was playing the class envy card about removing deductions for corporate jets? Well, he seems to have gotten over that problem now. In fact, one of his aides is promising $1 Billion in subsidies for corporate jets. Remember how "fat cat bankers were all the reasons for the collapse of the economic system? Heck, the administration was even deciding how much pay the CEOs should get. The administration is willing to put aside their seriously expressed outrage so long as the bankers are willing to subsidize his campaign.
Remember the big evolution in his thinking about gay marriage? First, he was for it before he was against it, but now, with lost of money being withheld by the Gay Community, Obama has had a change of heart and is once again in favor of gay marriage. Just in time for the George Clooney fund raiser.
Are you noticing a pattern here?
Add to the list everyone of his '08 campaign promises. Gitmo, tribunals, Afghanistan was the "correct war" no red state, no blue state, just the United States, and oh so many others.
Obama is either a sociopath or an inveterate liar who cannot tell the truth. The only conviction that I believe he holds dear is that he has to maintain power. And everyone of his supporters will take their turn at being demonized and disrespected so long as he can keep on filling his campaign coffers.
Suckers!
UPDATE: When you have lost Noam Chomsky, who is left?
Remember the big evolution in his thinking about gay marriage? First, he was for it before he was against it, but now, with lost of money being withheld by the Gay Community, Obama has had a change of heart and is once again in favor of gay marriage. Just in time for the George Clooney fund raiser.
Are you noticing a pattern here?
Add to the list everyone of his '08 campaign promises. Gitmo, tribunals, Afghanistan was the "correct war" no red state, no blue state, just the United States, and oh so many others.
Obama is either a sociopath or an inveterate liar who cannot tell the truth. The only conviction that I believe he holds dear is that he has to maintain power. And everyone of his supporters will take their turn at being demonized and disrespected so long as he can keep on filling his campaign coffers.
Suckers!
UPDATE: When you have lost Noam Chomsky, who is left?
Friday, May 11, 2012
Manufactured Outrage
The Democrats and the MSM have been having a hard time trying to convince us all that we need to be so outraged at those wascally Republicans. Why, did you know that Romney once had a dog that he put in a kennel on the car roof? The shamelessness of it all. Then the other side pointed out that at least he didn't eat the dog. This caused that line of attack to fall flat.
Recently, we have learned that Romney led a gang of prep school thugs who may, or may not have given a kid an impromptu haircut. Five thousand words on this deeply interesting subject, and yet, so little about Obama, even now that we have learned. The fact that the WaPo's story started running into refutation almost from the minute it hit the online posting has served to further reduce any pretense they might have had to being something other than just another shill for the Democrats.
Let's face it, the Left has lost their credibility. Their influence is gone because everyone know that they are no longer honest brokers. It's a shame that they did this to themselves, but tautologically speaking, they did this to themselves. "Nice soul you got there son, pity if you sold it too cheap." And cheap it is.
But the highlight of futility has to be the new program to properly teach Democrats how to play the race card. Sure, you thought that they would have that down pat now, since they fail at basic logic, reasoning or facts. But no, they are doubling down on it because it has always worked so well in the past. Don't believe me? Here is an example:
A pure statement of fact is suddenly racist because of the color of the skin of the President? Kind of reminds me of that old "You can't win, you can't lose, you can't tie, you can't even leave the game."
But I think the Democrats are not realizing how ineffective that they are seeming when that is the best argument that they have.
Not that that will stop them from trying.
Recently, we have learned that Romney led a gang of prep school thugs who may, or may not have given a kid an impromptu haircut. Five thousand words on this deeply interesting subject, and yet, so little about Obama, even now that we have learned. The fact that the WaPo's story started running into refutation almost from the minute it hit the online posting has served to further reduce any pretense they might have had to being something other than just another shill for the Democrats.
Let's face it, the Left has lost their credibility. Their influence is gone because everyone know that they are no longer honest brokers. It's a shame that they did this to themselves, but tautologically speaking, they did this to themselves. "Nice soul you got there son, pity if you sold it too cheap." And cheap it is.
But the highlight of futility has to be the new program to properly teach Democrats how to play the race card. Sure, you thought that they would have that down pat now, since they fail at basic logic, reasoning or facts. But no, they are doubling down on it because it has always worked so well in the past. Don't believe me? Here is an example:
As samples of race-coded rhetoric, Wiley reminded the Democrats of statements by Republican presidential candidates Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich. Of Gingrich's famous comment about President Obama, her distributed remarks note, "Calling a Black man 'the food stamp president' is not a race-neutral statement, even if Newt Gingrich did not intend racism."Do you notice that it's only racist to call a black man the "Food Stamp President?" Oh, man, we have come so far in our progress to equality haven't we?
But the threshold for what constitutes racially charged messaging is not always so high. One of Santorum's cited comments was: "Give them more food stamps, give them more Medicaid is the administration's approach, rather than creating jobs." She also cited this comment from House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, R-Va., about raising taxes to fund government programs: "I've never believed that you go raise taxes on those that are paying in, taking from them, so that you just hand out and give them to someone else."
A pure statement of fact is suddenly racist because of the color of the skin of the President? Kind of reminds me of that old "You can't win, you can't lose, you can't tie, you can't even leave the game."
But I think the Democrats are not realizing how ineffective that they are seeming when that is the best argument that they have.
Not that that will stop them from trying.
Wednesday, May 09, 2012
The Spineless Obama
After years of evolving his position on gay marriage, (read holding his finger to the wind) President Obama has made the decision that he is personally in favor of gay marriage. While much may be made of this daring pronouncement, let's go back to the words that he used. He is personally in favor of it. Not that he is going to push it as part of the Administration's policies, but just that now, you can be gay and get married in his opinion.
As long as your state doesn't ban it of course. Then, he would be opposed. Wouldn't want to offend those who are opposed to gay marriage, and wouldn't want to offend some of his biggest contributors.
What, oh what is a person to do?
How about have a spine and the courage of your convictions?
Not that that is ever going to happen.
As long as your state doesn't ban it of course. Then, he would be opposed. Wouldn't want to offend those who are opposed to gay marriage, and wouldn't want to offend some of his biggest contributors.
What, oh what is a person to do?
How about have a spine and the courage of your convictions?
Not that that is ever going to happen.
Monday, May 07, 2012
How Romney Should Deal with Ron Paul
Paul picked up a bunch of delegates to the Republican convention over the weekend. What's that you say, I thought Romney had it sewn up? Well he does, but the Paulies are still out there and a force to be reckoned with.
My solution - Promise to appoint Ron Paul to be chairman of the Federal Reserve.
Of course the consternation to financial markets will be damaging, but it sure would be a lot of fun.
My solution - Promise to appoint Ron Paul to be chairman of the Federal Reserve.
Of course the consternation to financial markets will be damaging, but it sure would be a lot of fun.
It's Midnight in America
Reagan's re-election campaign kicked off in 1984 used the phrase "It's Morning in America" proclaiming that the country is "prouder, stronger and better" than it was four years ago. Enter Obama, who really can't say the same thing. Sure, the spin has been there is a great improvement from the horrible Bush years. Why remember when it was a crisis to have unemployment at 6%? Now, we are supposed to be thrilled that enough people have stopped looking for work that the unemployment rate dropped to 8.1%.
Obama is now arguing that we need to imagine an America four years from now that will be better than it is. I agree with him, so long as he is defeated in November.
Obama is now arguing that we need to imagine an America four years from now that will be better than it is. I agree with him, so long as he is defeated in November.
Friday, May 04, 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)