At the above link is a story about two teens who took pictures of themselves having sex and were prosecuted (as adults) for making child pornography.
When you combine this nonsense with The Anna Nichole judge and the Florida Supreme Court in Bush v. Gore, you gotta wonder if there might be a maximum IQ limit for becoming a Florida judge.
I'm thinking just above comfortable room temperature, and you might be disqualified.
Thursday, February 22, 2007
More Hillarity
This is absolutely wonderful. Nancy Pelosi is saying that Dick Cheney is questioning her patriotism, because Dick says that Nancy's plan for an immediate defeat (oops - strategic withdrawal (oops, I had it right the first time)) is just what Al Qaida wants.
So, let me see if I get this right: If you are a Democrat and accuse the President of every perfidy imaginable, you are exercising your patriotic right of dissent. But if you are a Republican and say that the person's plan will have unintended consequences that will aid the enemy - well, you are questioning their patriotism.
I guess this goes with William Arkin's statement that US soldiers are all just mercenaries and they should not have an opinion that differs from his own. It's amusing to me, that this is much like my wife (The Good Democrat) who tells me "here is my opinion on such and such." And when I try to address her thoughts by offering facts or information that doesn't comport with her view, she cuts me off and tells me that I am just being arrogant.
No wonder we don't have informed debate in this country. We have become a bunch of babies who are annoyed with anything outside of our world view.
So, let me see if I get this right: If you are a Democrat and accuse the President of every perfidy imaginable, you are exercising your patriotic right of dissent. But if you are a Republican and say that the person's plan will have unintended consequences that will aid the enemy - well, you are questioning their patriotism.
I guess this goes with William Arkin's statement that US soldiers are all just mercenaries and they should not have an opinion that differs from his own. It's amusing to me, that this is much like my wife (The Good Democrat) who tells me "here is my opinion on such and such." And when I try to address her thoughts by offering facts or information that doesn't comport with her view, she cuts me off and tells me that I am just being arrogant.
No wonder we don't have informed debate in this country. We have become a bunch of babies who are annoyed with anything outside of our world view.
Saturday, February 17, 2007
Tuesday, February 13, 2007
Do tax cuts for the rich help the poor?
At the above link, is a pretty good analysis of the effects of the Bush tax cuts. It seems that the Senate taxation committee relies on errant data or analysis in forecasting the effect of tax cuts.
If the objective of liberals is to increase revenue to the Treasury in order to pay for more social programs, the evidence points to tax cuts. If the objective is wealth redistribution, then tax increases are the answer.
So, do you want to help fund government programs, or do you want to punish the rich? Can't have it both ways.
If the objective of liberals is to increase revenue to the Treasury in order to pay for more social programs, the evidence points to tax cuts. If the objective is wealth redistribution, then tax increases are the answer.
So, do you want to help fund government programs, or do you want to punish the rich? Can't have it both ways.
Wednesday, February 07, 2007
I am guilty!
As anyone who knows me would have to testify, I am guilty of contempt of Congress. In fact, I have no defense at all, and am fully aware that if charged, I would have to admit to the allegation.
But my contempt doesn't stop there. Remember during the judicial nominations that the Democrats when they were in the minority would threaten to filibuster? At that time, it was considered by the MSM to be responsibly acting on the behalf of the minority party. Now, we get this. The media are stating that the Republican minority is blocking debate, when the reality is that the Democrats want to end the debate. What a crazy world we live in.
Kind of reminds me of the sage words I read before:
Maybe it is time to not make words work so hard.
But my contempt doesn't stop there. Remember during the judicial nominations that the Democrats when they were in the minority would threaten to filibuster? At that time, it was considered by the MSM to be responsibly acting on the behalf of the minority party. Now, we get this. The media are stating that the Republican minority is blocking debate, when the reality is that the Democrats want to end the debate. What a crazy world we live in.
Kind of reminds me of the sage words I read before:
"When I use a word, Humpty Dumpty said, in rather a scornful tone, 'it means just what I choose it to mean--neither more nor less.'
The question is, said Alice, whether you CAN make words mean so many different things. . . .
When I make a word do a lot of work like that, said Humpty Dumpty, I always pay it extra. . . .
Maybe it is time to not make words work so hard.
Sunday, February 04, 2007
A Proposed Senate Resolution on the Surge
The Senate is presently trying to reach a non-binding resolution to let Pres. Bush know that they are not happy. I understand that there have been a lot of different proposals which have failed to garner the 60 votes needed to overcome a filibuster. In the spirit of trying to he helpful, I am offering a proposal that I think pretty well covers all of their concerns:
110th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. RES. 28
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
February 5, 2007
Mr. DODD (for himself, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. HAGEL, Mrs. CLINTON and Mr. LUGAR) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee of the whole
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Establishing the Sense of the Senate that it wishes to impart to Mr. George W. Bush, President (for the moment) of the United States.
Whereas half of the membership of our body is preparing or is running for the office of the President of the United States;
Whereas after the recent elections, the public having expressed its collective voice as we interpret it;
Whereas those of us who are not running for the Presidency are in deep trouble for our re-election;
Whereas those Democratic Senators who voted for the war in 2003 were reflecting the will of the public and their own chances for re-election;
Whereas the Republican Senators are now faced with the same choice as their counterparts earlier had;
Whereas we unanimously voted to appoint Gen. Petraeus as the Commander of all Multi National Forces in Iraq;
Whereas General Petraeus having requested more troops in order to accomplish the mission that he has been assigned;
Whereas we are getting beat up in the polls and recognize that our re-election is necessary for the safety of the Republic; and,
Whereas we have demonstrated that we collectively have the spine of an immature jelly fish;
Whereas we are desperately seeking a way to have it both ways;
Whereas we are willing to show our enemies and allies alike that we are feckless;
Whereas we don't know what to do, but agree that criticizing the President at this date and time has political advantages that simply cannot be ignored: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That--
(1) it is the sense of the Senate that we pass a meaningless resolution with no teeth;
(2) the Senate--
(A) blames George W. Bush for every problem that exists in this world
(B) requests that the President issue a proclamation calling upon the people of Iraq to--
(i) take the blame that cannot be assumed by the President; and
(ii) give us the necessary political cover to look good..
This is just my proposal, maybe all the members of the blogosphere should provide their own version for consideration.
110th CONGRESS
1st Session
S. RES. 28
IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES
February 5, 2007
Mr. DODD (for himself, Mr. COCHRAN, Mr. AKAKA, Mr. BAUCUS, Mr. BINGAMAN, Mr. DURBIN, Mr. FEINGOLD, Mr. HAGEL, Mr. KENNEDY, Mr. LAUTENBERG, Mr. LIEBERMAN, Mr. BIDEN, Mr. OBAMA, Mr. HAGEL, Mrs. CLINTON and Mr. LUGAR) submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee of the whole
_______________________________________________________________________
RESOLUTION
Establishing the Sense of the Senate that it wishes to impart to Mr. George W. Bush, President (for the moment) of the United States.
Whereas half of the membership of our body is preparing or is running for the office of the President of the United States;
Whereas after the recent elections, the public having expressed its collective voice as we interpret it;
Whereas those of us who are not running for the Presidency are in deep trouble for our re-election;
Whereas those Democratic Senators who voted for the war in 2003 were reflecting the will of the public and their own chances for re-election;
Whereas the Republican Senators are now faced with the same choice as their counterparts earlier had;
Whereas we unanimously voted to appoint Gen. Petraeus as the Commander of all Multi National Forces in Iraq;
Whereas General Petraeus having requested more troops in order to accomplish the mission that he has been assigned;
Whereas we are getting beat up in the polls and recognize that our re-election is necessary for the safety of the Republic; and,
Whereas we have demonstrated that we collectively have the spine of an immature jelly fish;
Whereas we are desperately seeking a way to have it both ways;
Whereas we are willing to show our enemies and allies alike that we are feckless;
Whereas we don't know what to do, but agree that criticizing the President at this date and time has political advantages that simply cannot be ignored: Now, therefore, be it
Resolved, That--
(1) it is the sense of the Senate that we pass a meaningless resolution with no teeth;
(2) the Senate--
(A) blames George W. Bush for every problem that exists in this world
(B) requests that the President issue a proclamation calling upon the people of Iraq to--
(i) take the blame that cannot be assumed by the President; and
(ii) give us the necessary political cover to look good..
This is just my proposal, maybe all the members of the blogosphere should provide their own version for consideration.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)