at Left in the West. I was posting a link from LITW to Big Sky Cairn, who was looking for any Sinestra member that would call out Jay Stevens on his purposeful lies, and I noticed it seemed longer than usual.
Here is the link: http://www.leftinthewest.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=E32A1B4CF23755C1C595CA3F68E023E2?diaryId=1678
Do you notice the "jsessionid=" part of the URL? Now what exactly is that, I wonder? Could it be a way to snoop into your computer? Maybe a way to track who is linking to that post? Perhaps it's just a way to catch Wulfgar when he is using his State computer when he should be working.
Whatever the purpose, I would advise everyone to not use it since it seems to be a pretty sneaky invasion of your privacy.
UPDATE A friend who is computer literate has taken a look at the jsessionid matter and thinks that it is innocuous.
Therefore, I am wrong, and I apologize.
Steve
27 comments:
"Perhaps it's just a way to catch Wulfgar when he is using his State computer when he should be working."
Well, first on a point of fact, Wulfgar is employed by the ASMSU (I think) and not the state per se.
But for all of the blogging and commenting he does it's not a stretch to say that it's his employer he doesn't work for.
Wrong on all counts, gentlemen (a term I use very loosely in your cases), as well as unbelievably hypocritical in your case, Steve. One would think a man running for public office wouldn't be so ignorant or idiotic. I guess the electorate you seek is just used to disappointment.
Well, there you go again.
Ya' know Steve, few things are more unseemly that a lawyer without logic. Your avowed tactic of dismissal won't work against a dismissal. You can't (in this sense) negate a negative. Even Budge could tell you that. You were wrong; so was Budge. You could just admit it, but no ...
You're still here? Why don't you run along outside. Grownups are talking here.
Nothing that would interest you.
I'm not so sorry to point out, Steve, that you libeled me in public. Only an idiot would think I wouldn't take an interest in that. Are you an idiot, Steve ... is that your problem?
You're the dip running for office, Steve, not me. Kindly take it from an adult that the more BS you post, the more information the voters will have at their disposal with which to make a choice.
And don't bother deleting this. I screen cap everything from you. You see, I'm not ignorant of the Internets, such as you are.
YOU'RE STILL HERE?
Can't you understand basic English?
Let me put it to you this way: First, do not try to do any legal analysis; Second, I really don't care what you have to say; and Third, Sometimes I just like to piss you off.
So you're just a pissy liar? Is that what you're admitting to?
Your persistent ignorance is amazing. Maybe this will help: http://www.bozeman.k12.mt.us/adlted/
You can't even make a hot link? How sad for you.
Let's be clear, Steve. You stupidly attacked me *and my employment* for no reason, while fretting over something you know nothing about. That was ignorant, stupid and futile. You would be better served by just admitting you were wrong, just as you did with your pathetic mewlings about LiTW. But no, you had to attempt further insult. That's pathetic, kitten. (and strictly speaking, libel, considering that you accused me of misusing state funds with no proof or knowledge.) Just admit that you were wrong, and move on. That's all you have to do. But I doubt you will.
Steve,
It called Google, and it isnt that hard. I'll teach you sometime if you like.
Post like this give bloggers a bad name buddy. Your running for office? Really?
Oh come on, Budge. Your accolite is in trouble here. Won't you rise to the occasion and defend him?
". In doing so, he teems up with Dave Budge, fresh off his stint of fleecing old people,..."
Now that's libel.
On the contrary, Dave. You've admitted online that most of your clients are older, and you get money from them for 'services' you provide. If it be my opinion that you are fleecing them for services that others could provide, where indeed is the libel? Did you, or did you not directly claim that I am not performing my duties for my employers? Why yes you did. I can prove the computer use policies of my employers, and the times I post. You, on the other hand, have never shown the value of service you provide to your clients. Please, Dave, by all means take me to court. One might envision a scenario where state auditors climb so far up your ass that your tonsils tickle. Or, you could simply just admit that your facts were wrong, you misspoke, and let this go. And Mr. Eschenbacher, candidate, could get drug into this whole mess with his specious claim having started the affair. Your choice, cupcake.
Wulfgar, you're fucking with the wrong guy!
I didn't accuse you of a crime.
No, Dave, I'm fucking with a whiny little dipstick who can dish it out but can't take it. What a wuss you are.
I love it.
Wulfgar, the little weenie who deletes posts from his blog that point out his mistakes or changes the wording of posts to make the poster look bad.
Wulfgar, the little weenie who libels everyone.
Wulfgar, the little weenie who works in the basement of an MSU building for a “business” that receives all it income from MSU and claims he doesn’t work for the state.
Well, there he goes again.
Stupidity like that is beyond comprehension, nor is it able to be replicated. Thank God.
dc kidd, a whiney little dipshit who objects to having his racist wailings altered or deleted. (Would you like me to re-post your comments that Dave Budge has reviled you for?)
dc kidd, an anonymous little shit who has not the courage to post comment such that any know his name. Truly indicative of Steve-the-candidates fanship (except that dc kidd isn't from Missoula or even Montana).
dc kidd, hater of business.
Steve, following the comment by dc kidd:
Stupidity like that is beyond comprehension, nor is it able to be replicated. Thank God.
Thanks for the agreement, Steve. (Context is everything, kitten.)
Let us not forget that dckid is a famous racist commenter from What's Right In Montana (and I still have the screen caps to prove that one).
Great crowed you have going on here Steve Eschenbacher, Republican candidate for House District 96 in Missoula Montana.
What does the retarded adolescent Wulfgar have to say about me?
Wulfie is just upset because he feels that he has been "libeled." Except, you can't libel a fictional character, nor can a fictional character bring an action in district court.
I suppose it could be his alter-ego, super clerk, Rob, but how would I know that? And why would Rob feel that his job is in jeopardy from something the idiotic Wulfgar does?
So, when I say "There he goes again" it just means that he is stirring up dust that has no meaning, context or logic. Just like always.
Screen Cap That!
Now this was fun. Steve - you grabbed the proverbial wolf by the ears, so to speak.
Wulfgar is a fictitious character? Too funny!
But hey, that DC Kidd is real, all right.
Hee hee heeh-ah!
Speaking of “sneaky SOBs,” over at his blog site, Wulfgar the Invincible is groveling at the feet of Dave Budge, begging him not to sue for libel. Watching Wulfgar wet his panties is pretty funny, but the funniest part is he thinks he has published a valid retraction of his libelous assault on Dave Budge.
Will somebody tell the little pup that a retraction must be published in the same place as the original libel? Like here.
Okay, I screwed up, and I admitted it. Since Wulfgar has his screen caps, I am thinking of deleting this whole post.
Post a Comment